Why do we put up with it?
I'm just sitting here thinking - it took me over 3 decades to shout up!
I decided to take it further because I spoke up to a policeman that actually believed me, and also had some understanding of what the impact was upon my life!
The whole thing was then taken over by CPS and the Judicial System.
I never got to speak to the Prosecution Barrister (he was prosecuting for the Crown, not for me, nor for the other witnesses). The defence was obviously speaking up for the now convicted paedophile James Fowler!
I was never asked by anyone if there was any specific aspect of the case that I would like to be emphasised!
Why did they not make a point of 'similar behaviour' relating to Police investigations in 2004, rather than accepting that nothing had occurred since 1977 (latest crimes for which he was convicted).
I know that most people now think that I got a decent result, and that it's time to move on!
Is it acceptable to be ripped off and say that it doesn't matter?
Today I received my second response from the Attorney General's office - they are contacting the CPS for a comment!
I actually laughed when I opened the letter... I've already told them that I had spoken to CPS, and was not satisfied with their response, which is why I wrote to The Attorney General!
Is it me? Am I thick or do these learned gentlemen and ladies just not understand anything??
Where can you buy a **** off rubber mallet?
Best wishes Rik ( sat here with an inane grin on my face).
I decided to take it further because I spoke up to a policeman that actually believed me, and also had some understanding of what the impact was upon my life!
The whole thing was then taken over by CPS and the Judicial System.
I never got to speak to the Prosecution Barrister (he was prosecuting for the Crown, not for me, nor for the other witnesses). The defence was obviously speaking up for the now convicted paedophile James Fowler!
I was never asked by anyone if there was any specific aspect of the case that I would like to be emphasised!
Why did they not make a point of 'similar behaviour' relating to Police investigations in 2004, rather than accepting that nothing had occurred since 1977 (latest crimes for which he was convicted).
I know that most people now think that I got a decent result, and that it's time to move on!
Is it acceptable to be ripped off and say that it doesn't matter?
Today I received my second response from the Attorney General's office - they are contacting the CPS for a comment!
I actually laughed when I opened the letter... I've already told them that I had spoken to CPS, and was not satisfied with their response, which is why I wrote to The Attorney General!
Is it me? Am I thick or do these learned gentlemen and ladies just not understand anything??
Where can you buy a **** off rubber mallet?
Best wishes Rik ( sat here with an inane grin on my face).