Who needs a youtube video next?
mark250676
Registrant
Let me know.
Deniz?
Randall?
Or someone else?
Cheers
Mark
Deniz?
Randall?
Or someone else?
Cheers
Mark
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Who needs a youtube video next?
- Thread startermark250676
- Start date
Mathew Kelly
reality2k4
Registrant
Colin Inglis is my bet, look him up on google.
He is totally innocent.
He worked for Humberside police federation, and covered up sex offences for Ian Huntley.
He was found not guilty in a trial where he never uttered a word, but this is one of other trials where he made the complainants feel 'guilty'.
When Huntley allegedly killed those girls, it was admitted that records wusere not filed on offences he committed, allowing him to have a clean record applying for jobs.
Was it huntley or just using him as a scapegoat for sex rings that abuse kids.
Those kids probably were going to tell, and they lost their lives.
I would say that Huntley was forced to do what he did, in an offering to find a way out of something that went out of control, but this case needs to know that this was the hub of a child sex ring.
In withholding information, Inglis defended the Chief Constable who was sacked.
Inglis was indicted on child abuse charges arising out of care homes he worked in.
As usual he portrayed his innocence and said these kids made it up, because he was homosexual.#
Child abusers are generally not gay, but he used the homosexual identity to defend himself.
Go get him,
ste
He is totally innocent.
He worked for Humberside police federation, and covered up sex offences for Ian Huntley.
He was found not guilty in a trial where he never uttered a word, but this is one of other trials where he made the complainants feel 'guilty'.
When Huntley allegedly killed those girls, it was admitted that records wusere not filed on offences he committed, allowing him to have a clean record applying for jobs.
Was it huntley or just using him as a scapegoat for sex rings that abuse kids.
Those kids probably were going to tell, and they lost their lives.
I would say that Huntley was forced to do what he did, in an offering to find a way out of something that went out of control, but this case needs to know that this was the hub of a child sex ring.
In withholding information, Inglis defended the Chief Constable who was sacked.
Inglis was indicted on child abuse charges arising out of care homes he worked in.
As usual he portrayed his innocence and said these kids made it up, because he was homosexual.#
Child abusers are generally not gay, but he used the homosexual identity to defend himself.
Go get him,
ste
Read this!!
The real JK 1 has been noticed!
https://timworstall.typepad.com/timworstall/2006/10/jonathan_king.html
The real JK 1 has been noticed!
https://timworstall.typepad.com/timworstall/2006/10/jonathan_king.html