What does it mean?

What does it mean?
I guess this is where to put this...

I know that there has been a thread similar to this before, but this is something I've been struggling with for a while.

After figuring out my sexuality, I've been trying to figure out what that means, exactly, beyond being attracted to men.

I'm not even sure there IS any particular meaning other than as a label of convenience.

Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated.
 
i am not sure why there is a need to look for putting a meaning on being physically attracted to men -

society in some countries supports us and so it is normalized -and others it is not -yet - and so there may be a sense of illegitmacy - which is far from the truth -

it means nothing more than that we are -

and your romantic life is but a part of your life -

who you date - or marry is just a part of you and your life -

we do not have a big socio- historical - cutlural - acknowldedgement of gayness -
in a way that supports the vast majority of us
in our awakening to ourselves and in our daily life - but-

it's gotten a lot better-

staying happy in life and surviving - and working and loving - are still the most important challenges we have just like any others -

so ((((dewey))))

embrace yourself it's ok!
m
 
Mark, all,

Just to clarify the question, what does being gay mean ASIDE from being attracted to men? Anything in particular?
 
I don't know what you mean?
 
historically we have been a very creative and productive part of society

Alexander the Great - who first spread culture and theatre around the mediterranean and europe-

leonardo da vinci

michelangelo

william shakespeare

ian mckellen

abraham lincoln

the list goes on....

you can be very proud of yourself for being
part of distinguished list of
contributors to our society,
history, culture, and everyone's lives.
 
Maybe I don't know how to frame the question correctly. I'll come back to this.
 
Socrates,

Nureyev

James Dean

countless business people, executives

David Souter - one of the US Supreme court justices.

amd so on....

Look it up in an encyclopedia britannica .

I am serious.

M
 
and for athletes like yourself -
there are a huge huge number -

Carl Lewis

Greg Louganis

all walks of life...

m
 
I must admit Dewey - your line of questions really pisses me off -

If you're looking for something to hate about youself I will take no part in that

-

that is not a healing or part of a healing attitude -

it's part of the abuse mentality that was laid upon us -

- if you are interested in gender studies or gay studies -

the San Francisco Publice library has a marvelous and one of the first of it's kind gay studies section -a big beautiful section of the library -

that you can go to and look at - and learn - as much as you need -

peace dude -

mark
 
Mark, it seems you took things to a dark side when in fact, I think Dewey is looking for something to love about his gayness beyond the sexuality part of it.

I think I am in a similar place. I don't hate myself nor do I want to but I too am looking for meaning about being gay beyond sex.

Since I work in the cultural/historical arena (museums) I have been adamant about providing more opportunities provide gay audiences - both in and out of the closet - more positive messages about what gay life can be.

I am working toward (I think, though I don't know this for sure yet) helping to establish a more significant presence for GLBT history and culture than the SF library section. I envision a place that addresses how societies around the world and historically have dealt with queer communities ("queer" by the way, is not meant to be negative - it's an acceptable term in academia).

Anyway, seems to me the list that MGB started is a key to finding a way to embrace our community of gay men historically and that is helpful.

We need more positive places to reflect on what "gay" means, exactly. Not negatively, but what purpose can we serve in a balanced and just world. I think the story of Silo and Roy (the gay penguins) moves us in that direction.

Best,
john
 
Originally posted by markgreyblue:
I must admit Dewey - your line of questions really pisses me off -

If you're looking for something to hate about youself I will take no part in that
On the contrary, Mark, I am looking for same thing as John above:
Originally posted by Hanginon:
I think I am in a similar place. I don't hate myself nor do I want to but I too am looking for meaning about being gay beyond sex.
I am looking for meaning beyond that which obviously defines gay people (attraction to the same sex). At the risk of offending people for an analogy - and please know I mean NO offense whatsoever - I look at this as similar to what it means to be an African American beyond skin color, for to believe that skin tone is all that makes one African American is superficial, both literally and figuratively.

Does that make any more sense?
 
sorry guys

i projected a period of self loathing out there - that was back when --

i remembered you were not feeling so good - so i imagined - whatever erroneously -

can i share an article with you both?
that i love
i wish somehow i could get it to you - it's a scan since the article was on paper-

it's
an article from gay magazine "fab"
that talks of gay friendship -
i love it -

it's wonderful I think -

I am not sure where to put it -

so you can download it -
M
 
We need more positive places to reflect on what "gay" means, exactly. Not negatively, but what purpose can we serve in a balanced and just world. I think the story of Silo and Roy (the gay penguins) moves us in that direction.

--------------

i think we should not focus on a role but rather ourselves - as just people who happen to be gay -

the US I fear - delivers such a message of hatred towards us - that we have to defend our sexuality -

i believe -
we are just men - who happen to be gay - we should not have to prop up our identity - with defenses - or perhaps stereotypical behavior
- we are dewey- hanginon -and mark

and we come from x place - studied x subject -
worked x job - believe in x values -
did x goofy things to learn x life lessons -
married or didn't the right guy - and so on..

does this make sense?

or is it that you are just curious?

I feel like there are esteem issues here -
when in the best possible world - they are not about us - but about those not supporting us -

we are amongst the most talented
intelligent -
and dedicated workers - crafts people -

and innovators -

powerful statesmen et al... -

I wish the article could get to you-

gay people are unique -

our friends are our family -

we create bonds like no other group

we have rejuvenate communities because of our caring
and perhaps this unity -

there's a lot out there! -
and we give back usually in taxes et al more than any other group!

:)
m
 
if you take the example of Wilton Manors -
in Fort Lauderdale - just a short while ago
was a crack den neighborhood -

now it is the most econimically vibrant part of fort lauderdale -

also the cops there - love us - in the aspect of
them saying - we hardly have any need to deal with things from our community(s)

we are generally peaceful law abiding -

i would say conservers of culture -

and expansive thinkers -

we aren't destructive people

m
 
I know loving yourself and being proud of yourself is extremely important -

our identities - are hugely needed for everyone not just homosexuals -

sadly the US culture is not a great place to be -

I would say that - a good book to read is -

"the four agreements" life - is not about a role -
or about just now -

there are so many ways to identify ourselves-

heritage - history - culture - sexuality - likes -hobbies -

beliefs - politics -

a figure - head -

the royal family -here that is -
the peace and stablity day to day -

and they way we get to know how we respond to things and how well we are caretaking of our 'charges' and ourselves -

not masochistic - but fair - moderate - life affirming -

I suppose this may seem like a rant -

i guess - i still

think if society permitted full rights in the US -
this conversation - would not be needed -

m
 
MGB,
You did two things just now - argued for individual identies for gay people, and then turned around and lumped us all together to come up with a positive image for us.

I think we are all on the same page - looking for a way to be individuals (ie, not fit squarely into the lisping, limp wristed stereotypes so often portrayed in movies)...while finding a positive group identity that carves out a meaningful place for us (revitalizing neighborhoods is one that we are known for...)

we are collectively and individually an important part of society and that's the truth. without us what would the world really look like?
 
Hey guys:

Wow, Dewey, clearly a great thread cuz you've pulled out some pretty strong responses in a real short time. All any of us can do is speak to this from our own experience, which is not the same as anyone else's. So, not better, not worse, just different. Here goes.

Dewey, being 'gay' has traditionally carried with it some implications of cultural as well as behavioral differences for those who so identify. This has been true since at least the nineteenth century, when groups of 'urnings' or 'uranians' (I love those names!) started categorizing their same-sex attraction as a facet not only of behavior, but of personhood, as a part of who they were as men and women. It is not clear that these folks were the first in history to do so, only that this is sort of where the 'modern' part of the story picks up.

In the twentieth century, this socialized aspect lent itself to a variety of movements that never really did coalesce into a single form of what it meant to be 'gay' besides the behavioral part. Even Kinsey's famous 0-6 scale is a little confused, since it evaluates both behavior and fantasy in charting an individual's place on the hetero-homo continuum. Nicely, however, all this socialized aspect did have a pay-off in political terms -- and you see the results everyday in the papers as countries around the world (including the U.S. and Canada, of course) grapple with what to do about people who aren't heterosexual.

Dewey, in my own life I count among my gay friends people who are or have been CIA operatives, policemen, doctors, lawyers, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, accountants, computer professionals of many kinds, secretaries, hair dressers, decorators, interior designers, barbers, psychologists, psychiatrists, fashion designers, firefighters, financial planners, and career armed forces personnel from all service branches in both the enlisted and officer ranks. The only things I can say that these men share in common is, 1) yes, the attraction to other men, but also 2) a need to have some number of friends who know them for who they are, and by "who they are" I mean their full identity, including their same-sex desires. There really isn't a lot more to it than that.

There's a lot of "gay" culture that makes it into the media, and that's nice when it means we get to see happy married couples with kids, or out single guys getting ahead in the world; it's less nice when it means we get to see what happens to the Matthew Shepards and Billy Jack Gaithers of this world. You can also see a lot of the surface of "gay" culture walking down certain streets of big cities -- the bars and bookstores and what-not. Nowadays, even out here in the suburbs, you can see a lot of the surface just, like, at the supermarket on Saturday afternoons when there seems to be as many same-sex as opposite-sex couples pushing grocery carts. Suburbia. Yawn.

So, Dewey, yeah, there's more to being "gay" than just the same-sex attraction. But, and this is a huge but, so I'm going to repeat it in capital letters

BUT

You, Dewey2k aka Dwayne, get to choose and make that "more than the attraction" part yourself. With a little help from your friends. And neighbors. And family.

Good luck, man.

{Dewey}

John
 
You did two things just now - argued for individual identies for gay people, and then turned around and lumped us all together to come up with a positive image for us.

are you angry with my arguments?

or do you like them - your response seems to be favorable - my mind is tired at this point -
i am not so easily discerning -

m
 
hey can someone give me an email that i can distribut this article too -

I wish there were a blind - email distribution so that - we wouldn't break the rules but also share info - this article -

ok - i just thinks it 'spot on'

m
 
Mark,

Good heavens, no, I'm not angry with your arguments. The idea is that being a part of a culture is something we can choose to do uncritically -- we can accept what we see around us and merge ourselves with that identity; we can choose to do it piece-meal -- i.e., we can take the parts we like and want and need and merge those with our identities; and we can also do it in a way that says "Hey, I'm going to change this culture by being a part of it because I'm different from what I see around me and I'm not going to change myself just to fit in." There's a culture side/There's an individual side. Connection/Individual Story. Kind of circular, eh?

And Mark, regarding David Souter,
Souter's engaging personality explains his quick friendship with fellow justices. As one of the few people unoffended by Scalia's verbal argumentation style, Souter has become a good friend with the conservative justice despite the fact that they often clash on controversial issues. Souter has maintained his simple, bachelor lifestyle. He brings his own lunch, consisting of apples and yogurt, to work everyday and lives in an undecorated apartment. He still returns home to Weare during the summer breaks where he climbs the local mountains and visits his mother.
from www.oyez.org, the Multi-Media Supreme Court Experience

Not every 60-plus-year-old bachelor who lunches on apples and yogurt and goes home to his mother every summer between Supreme Court sittings is necessarily gay. Hee. Ha. Ho. Okay, okay, Justice Souter just confuses the hell out of me.

:)

{Mark} {Dewey} {Hanginon}

John
 
Back
Top