Hey guys:
Wow, Dewey, clearly a great thread cuz you've pulled out some pretty strong responses in a real short time. All any of us can do is speak to this from our own experience, which is not the same as anyone else's. So, not better, not worse, just different. Here goes.
Dewey, being 'gay' has traditionally carried with it some implications of cultural as well as behavioral differences for those who so identify. This has been true since at least the nineteenth century, when groups of 'urnings' or 'uranians' (I love those names!) started categorizing their same-sex attraction as a facet not only of behavior, but of personhood, as a part of who they were as men and women. It is not clear that these folks were the first in history to do so, only that this is sort of where the 'modern' part of the story picks up.
In the twentieth century, this socialized aspect lent itself to a variety of movements that never really did coalesce into a single form of what it meant to be 'gay' besides the behavioral part. Even Kinsey's famous 0-6 scale is a little confused, since it evaluates both behavior and fantasy in charting an individual's place on the hetero-homo continuum. Nicely, however, all this socialized aspect did have a pay-off in political terms -- and you see the results everyday in the papers as countries around the world (including the U.S. and Canada, of course) grapple with what to do about people who aren't heterosexual.
Dewey, in my own life I count among my gay friends people who are or have been CIA operatives, policemen, doctors, lawyers, carpenters, electricians, plumbers, accountants, computer professionals of many kinds, secretaries, hair dressers, decorators, interior designers, barbers, psychologists, psychiatrists, fashion designers, firefighters, financial planners, and career armed forces personnel from all service branches in both the enlisted and officer ranks. The only things I can say that these men share in common is, 1) yes, the attraction to other men, but also 2) a need to have some number of friends who know them for who they are, and by "who they are" I mean their full identity, including their same-sex desires. There really isn't a lot more to it than that.
There's a lot of "gay" culture that makes it into the media, and that's nice when it means we get to see happy married couples with kids, or out single guys getting ahead in the world; it's less nice when it means we get to see what happens to the Matthew Shepards and Billy Jack Gaithers of this world. You can also see a lot of the surface of "gay" culture walking down certain streets of big cities -- the bars and bookstores and what-not. Nowadays, even out here in the suburbs, you can see a lot of the surface just, like, at the supermarket on Saturday afternoons when there seems to be as many same-sex as opposite-sex couples pushing grocery carts. Suburbia. Yawn.
So, Dewey, yeah, there's more to being "gay" than just the same-sex attraction. But, and this is a huge but, so I'm going to repeat it in capital letters
BUT
You, Dewey2k aka Dwayne, get to choose and make that "more than the attraction" part yourself. With a little help from your friends. And neighbors. And family.
Good luck, man.
{Dewey}
John