Therapist - how to know about correct responses
I would describe myself as someone who has buried and partial memories. I have not done a lot of work in this area really. Last year at some point a memory came back to me , but only the framework of it, a good portion of it remains unclear.
I've been working with a therapist now for about 4 -5 months, and it has been to recently talk type of therapy, mostly of my choosing.
With apparent inner unresolved problems I was offered a number of different treatments on exploring issues. I chose EMDR, first because I had never tried it before, secondly it seemed somewhat less vague.
While I was asked to pick a traumatic experience of less substance, after doing some thinking I went ahead with the experience referenced above.
Now I've had 3 sessions using EMDR revolving around this particular experience. I will admit that vague, somewhat cloudy images have come into my mind. This includes a weird feeling of recognition without the ability to actually place it clearly in my mind.
So the last time, amidst post session review the therapist felt that I had undergone a very traumatic experience including "rape". My response (albeit coming from my logical and defensive self said that until I was completely sure and I could actually remember the entire event I can commit to that type of conclusion. The therapist responded by giving me a look of "come on - how much more evidence do we need". At that point, I still protested, and then 30 seconds later, felt within me some sort of slight release that it was okay to cry about the event , even though I still dont know what the event completely entailed.
So all this explanation for a quick question. Is there a point where a therapist, based on their professional experiene and knowledge can make an assessment as such ? Or is it more appropriate for them to completely refrain from all feedback and commentary until the patient knows within themselves the truth ?
TIA
LNH
I've been working with a therapist now for about 4 -5 months, and it has been to recently talk type of therapy, mostly of my choosing.
With apparent inner unresolved problems I was offered a number of different treatments on exploring issues. I chose EMDR, first because I had never tried it before, secondly it seemed somewhat less vague.
While I was asked to pick a traumatic experience of less substance, after doing some thinking I went ahead with the experience referenced above.
Now I've had 3 sessions using EMDR revolving around this particular experience. I will admit that vague, somewhat cloudy images have come into my mind. This includes a weird feeling of recognition without the ability to actually place it clearly in my mind.
So the last time, amidst post session review the therapist felt that I had undergone a very traumatic experience including "rape". My response (albeit coming from my logical and defensive self said that until I was completely sure and I could actually remember the entire event I can commit to that type of conclusion. The therapist responded by giving me a look of "come on - how much more evidence do we need". At that point, I still protested, and then 30 seconds later, felt within me some sort of slight release that it was okay to cry about the event , even though I still dont know what the event completely entailed.
So all this explanation for a quick question. Is there a point where a therapist, based on their professional experiene and knowledge can make an assessment as such ? Or is it more appropriate for them to completely refrain from all feedback and commentary until the patient knows within themselves the truth ?
TIA
LNH