The Chicken or the Egg?????????
James_dup1
Registrant
Hi All,
I've just started reading "Betrayed as Boys" (thanks Richard it's great). In the first part of this book he defines two different type of abuse "Contact Abuse" and "Noncontact sexual abuse". It is the last one I want to talk about. In the book (page 25) it says "Noncontact sexual abuse includes a wide range of behaviors, some more easily documented than other: masturbating or therwise being sexual in front of a child; exposing gentials to a child for sexual gratifcation; encourgaing a child to be sexual with others; practicing voyeurism; photographing a child for sexual purposes; showing a chid pornography or making it available to him; engaging in sexualized talk with a child or confiding to him about sexual issues; ridicuiing a child's sexual development, prefreences, or organs; forcing a child to dress in an overrevealing manner; stropping oneself and or a child on order to hit or spank him, or getting sexual pleasure from spanking; employing sexually charged verbal or emotional abuse; having a child witness the sexual abuse of others; using sexual punishments; manifesting unusual interrest in and asking questions about sexuality; taking too much interest in haths at an inapproprite age; applying medication on genitals or chealing genitals when a child is old enough to do it himself (this does include contact, of course, but is usually to subtle to be consided contact abuse); and employing seductive looks or talk to a child that violate generational or personal boundaries." Ok thats the quote from the book.
Now, after reading this I started thinking about my life and relized that I was "set up" to be abused. What I mean is that lots of these things happened to me even before I was 6 which my first contact sexual abuse happened.
Anyway, I was reading the book and looking at the dates from the different studies and started thinking. (ok time for everyone to get scared) It seems the incedent's of abuse on boys is on the rise. Now, as I read the quote I wrote I applied it to my life, and things my sisters did or said, things like that. So then I thought about how the world has changed sence I have been born (1968, just in case you wanted to know). I wonder if society is also doing non contact abuse of our childern? What I mean is, in the 60's there was free love....nothing for people to walk around naked.....nothing for women to burn there bra's..........it was a free time. I was also a time that a lot of people that abused us grew up in. So, by that thinking did the enviorment around us just help the ones that abused us do it. We didnt think to much of it, it has been burned into our brain that seeing a naked person is ok........after all we seen them all the time as kids (of course I'm speaking in general here). I guess I was just wondering why it is that it seems that the cases of boys being abused and the way that the world looks at sex goes hand and hand. If "we" are just helping the bastards that do this by desynthasizing our kids to sex. I just wondered how many people watched victoy secretes underwear show? Then I wonder how many of the ones watching it also had there children with them. So by this when someone does aproch a child will it be easier for them. After all they see it everyday. I know from my personal experence, the noncontact sexual abuse (which I never looked at as abuse untill reading this book), made it easier for the one that did contactal abuse. By the time it started at 6 I had alread heard most of it. How many people sit and talk about sex or there sex life with a kid in the room and as lots do just forget that kids hear as well? So was the time of the 50's and the 60's a time of freedom or a time of chaining of our children?
I sure hope this came out right..........it just seemed to me that boys being abused took a sharp rise as did the sexual revalution.....so in this case revalution would be chaining and not freeing as one would think.
I've just started reading "Betrayed as Boys" (thanks Richard it's great). In the first part of this book he defines two different type of abuse "Contact Abuse" and "Noncontact sexual abuse". It is the last one I want to talk about. In the book (page 25) it says "Noncontact sexual abuse includes a wide range of behaviors, some more easily documented than other: masturbating or therwise being sexual in front of a child; exposing gentials to a child for sexual gratifcation; encourgaing a child to be sexual with others; practicing voyeurism; photographing a child for sexual purposes; showing a chid pornography or making it available to him; engaging in sexualized talk with a child or confiding to him about sexual issues; ridicuiing a child's sexual development, prefreences, or organs; forcing a child to dress in an overrevealing manner; stropping oneself and or a child on order to hit or spank him, or getting sexual pleasure from spanking; employing sexually charged verbal or emotional abuse; having a child witness the sexual abuse of others; using sexual punishments; manifesting unusual interrest in and asking questions about sexuality; taking too much interest in haths at an inapproprite age; applying medication on genitals or chealing genitals when a child is old enough to do it himself (this does include contact, of course, but is usually to subtle to be consided contact abuse); and employing seductive looks or talk to a child that violate generational or personal boundaries." Ok thats the quote from the book.
Now, after reading this I started thinking about my life and relized that I was "set up" to be abused. What I mean is that lots of these things happened to me even before I was 6 which my first contact sexual abuse happened.
Anyway, I was reading the book and looking at the dates from the different studies and started thinking. (ok time for everyone to get scared) It seems the incedent's of abuse on boys is on the rise. Now, as I read the quote I wrote I applied it to my life, and things my sisters did or said, things like that. So then I thought about how the world has changed sence I have been born (1968, just in case you wanted to know). I wonder if society is also doing non contact abuse of our childern? What I mean is, in the 60's there was free love....nothing for people to walk around naked.....nothing for women to burn there bra's..........it was a free time. I was also a time that a lot of people that abused us grew up in. So, by that thinking did the enviorment around us just help the ones that abused us do it. We didnt think to much of it, it has been burned into our brain that seeing a naked person is ok........after all we seen them all the time as kids (of course I'm speaking in general here). I guess I was just wondering why it is that it seems that the cases of boys being abused and the way that the world looks at sex goes hand and hand. If "we" are just helping the bastards that do this by desynthasizing our kids to sex. I just wondered how many people watched victoy secretes underwear show? Then I wonder how many of the ones watching it also had there children with them. So by this when someone does aproch a child will it be easier for them. After all they see it everyday. I know from my personal experence, the noncontact sexual abuse (which I never looked at as abuse untill reading this book), made it easier for the one that did contactal abuse. By the time it started at 6 I had alread heard most of it. How many people sit and talk about sex or there sex life with a kid in the room and as lots do just forget that kids hear as well? So was the time of the 50's and the 60's a time of freedom or a time of chaining of our children?
I sure hope this came out right..........it just seemed to me that boys being abused took a sharp rise as did the sexual revalution.....so in this case revalution would be chaining and not freeing as one would think.