Survivor questions re: sexuality and intimacy
Hi Taofish, sorry you were having a hard time last night. Wanted to respond but dealing with my own process. Nothing major, just distracting, making it hard to be present with others in a meaningful way.
Gosh, there are so many different variables in relationship dynamics. Can be very hard to sort. Interesting what catalyzes attention, reaction. And the thing that appears to be the issue may not be the issue at all. Sort and sift. Sort and sift. At least it sounds like y'all have a foundation, but it takes two regardless.
Am reminded of something my T told me. It's not the event but the meaning we attach to it. Read that elsewhere too. In my experience, "what it means" may not be "what it is." Ah, but how to know? Sometimes I just have to choose an option and go with it based on best current understanding of things. However, I may react strongly one way or another to the event based on what it means to me. And that meaning based on prior experience or interpretation, which may not be relevant to current situation. I think of this in my situation and perhaps relevant to you, as regards attention or lack thereof. If I ever felt validated (accepted) in a particular way, I tend to notice and attach significance to that when I see/feel it again. For example, depending on my state of being, someone's attention may scare me or I find myself in passionate fantasy. Both these reactions are based on the meaning I have (most likely) unconsciously assigned to the experience. In actuality, it may mean neither. Without open communication, it can be hard to discern either way. In my case, at least, the passionate fantasy may be as inaccurate as the fear. So I tend not to put too much credence on either without further (and hopefully objective) exploration. As a scientist, expect you relate to that.
AS for the female vs male survivor thing. I'd agree that it certainly seems harder, definitely IS different in some ways. At my most cynical, I think, but we're guys so who cares. That's very probably a result of my own conditioning. When I'm more in tune, I realize people are people, beyond culture, gender and role expectations; each deserves support, etc. Personally, I find myself relating very well to women survivors (assuming they aren't automatically triggered by a male bodied person - which I understand) but not so much to male survivors. Of course, if I look deeper, it isn't really about gender, but conditioned associations based on prior experience -- the meaning I associate with each.
Gosh, there are so many different variables in relationship dynamics. Can be very hard to sort. Interesting what catalyzes attention, reaction. And the thing that appears to be the issue may not be the issue at all. Sort and sift. Sort and sift. At least it sounds like y'all have a foundation, but it takes two regardless.
Am reminded of something my T told me. It's not the event but the meaning we attach to it. Read that elsewhere too. In my experience, "what it means" may not be "what it is." Ah, but how to know? Sometimes I just have to choose an option and go with it based on best current understanding of things. However, I may react strongly one way or another to the event based on what it means to me. And that meaning based on prior experience or interpretation, which may not be relevant to current situation. I think of this in my situation and perhaps relevant to you, as regards attention or lack thereof. If I ever felt validated (accepted) in a particular way, I tend to notice and attach significance to that when I see/feel it again. For example, depending on my state of being, someone's attention may scare me or I find myself in passionate fantasy. Both these reactions are based on the meaning I have (most likely) unconsciously assigned to the experience. In actuality, it may mean neither. Without open communication, it can be hard to discern either way. In my case, at least, the passionate fantasy may be as inaccurate as the fear. So I tend not to put too much credence on either without further (and hopefully objective) exploration. As a scientist, expect you relate to that.
AS for the female vs male survivor thing. I'd agree that it certainly seems harder, definitely IS different in some ways. At my most cynical, I think, but we're guys so who cares. That's very probably a result of my own conditioning. When I'm more in tune, I realize people are people, beyond culture, gender and role expectations; each deserves support, etc. Personally, I find myself relating very well to women survivors (assuming they aren't automatically triggered by a male bodied person - which I understand) but not so much to male survivors. Of course, if I look deeper, it isn't really about gender, but conditioned associations based on prior experience -- the meaning I associate with each.
Last edited by a moderator: