Secondary Victims -- thoughts?
Hi everyone,
I'm wondering what all of your thoughts are about this... with Dave (Lloydy)'s permission I am restarting a discussion I started with him via PM a day or two ago.
In the thread started by Emry titled "I need some advice too," I noticed and took issue with the phrasing of some of Dave's (excellent) advice-- specifically the part that said
By this definition, I was a secondary victim of my boyfriend's abuse before I ever knew he was a victim of sexual abuse at all-- since I found out about his acting out online about two months before he was able to fully disclose to me about his abuse. I think we all agree that the acting out is a direct effect of the abuse, and it certainly did me harm and suffering... especially in the first two months, before I knew what was going on.
So my question to Dave was-- Where does the "make sure" come in? How was I supposed to "make sure" that my boyfriend didn't hurt me by doing a hurtful thing that was motivated almost entirely by forces within himself? I think we all agree that if it were in anyone's power to "make sure" that he or she didn't become a victim, there would be no victims. So is this a fair burden to put on family and friends?
There is no avoiding some hurt and helplessness as a partner of a survivor. When family and friends post here to say that they've been abandoned, attacked, betrayed--I think it's a little late for "make sure"-- and I don't think it's fair to suggest that this secondary victimization is something that they can "make sure" to avoid again, unless they decide to sever ties with the survivor.
What I believed that Dave wanted to convey in his post is something that I entirely agree with, although I'd have phrased it differently. When we as partners/supporters in someone else's healing become over-involved, try to heal for the survivor, or stop taking good care of ourselves, it leads to severe burn-out and further feelings of victimization-- more intense depression, helplessness, confusion, anger, etc., and an inability to get out of dysfunctional patterns. We can make sure, or at least do our best to try, to avoid this re-victimization. It is our responsibility as partners to keep ourselves safe and whole, to maintain healthy boundaries and distance from our partner's issues, AND to remember compassion and patience as we support-- I guess, to move out of the mindset of a secondary victim and become a "secondary survivor."
Is there a separate journey we need to make from secondary victim to secondary survivor--especially if we've been directly harmed through assault, infidelity, and/or addiction caused by the abuse? Are we responsible for "our" victimization, or for our continued feelings of victimization if we end up supporting a survivor in ways that are unhealthy for us? Since so much of the healing process is obviously in the hands of the survivor, what real control do we have over our secondary healing process?
I'm wondering what all of your thoughts are about this... with Dave (Lloydy)'s permission I am restarting a discussion I started with him via PM a day or two ago.
In the thread started by Emry titled "I need some advice too," I noticed and took issue with the phrasing of some of Dave's (excellent) advice-- specifically the part that said
I've always understood "secondary victim" to mean anyone close to the primary victim (in this case, a SA survivor), who endures any kind of harm or suffering as a result of the survivor's SA, or a loved one who experiences feelings very much like the feelings of the victim (anger, fear, helplessness). I've also seen "secondary victim" applied to witnesses and first responders.Also think about yourself, make sure that you don't become a secondary victim.
By this definition, I was a secondary victim of my boyfriend's abuse before I ever knew he was a victim of sexual abuse at all-- since I found out about his acting out online about two months before he was able to fully disclose to me about his abuse. I think we all agree that the acting out is a direct effect of the abuse, and it certainly did me harm and suffering... especially in the first two months, before I knew what was going on.
So my question to Dave was-- Where does the "make sure" come in? How was I supposed to "make sure" that my boyfriend didn't hurt me by doing a hurtful thing that was motivated almost entirely by forces within himself? I think we all agree that if it were in anyone's power to "make sure" that he or she didn't become a victim, there would be no victims. So is this a fair burden to put on family and friends?
There is no avoiding some hurt and helplessness as a partner of a survivor. When family and friends post here to say that they've been abandoned, attacked, betrayed--I think it's a little late for "make sure"-- and I don't think it's fair to suggest that this secondary victimization is something that they can "make sure" to avoid again, unless they decide to sever ties with the survivor.
What I believed that Dave wanted to convey in his post is something that I entirely agree with, although I'd have phrased it differently. When we as partners/supporters in someone else's healing become over-involved, try to heal for the survivor, or stop taking good care of ourselves, it leads to severe burn-out and further feelings of victimization-- more intense depression, helplessness, confusion, anger, etc., and an inability to get out of dysfunctional patterns. We can make sure, or at least do our best to try, to avoid this re-victimization. It is our responsibility as partners to keep ourselves safe and whole, to maintain healthy boundaries and distance from our partner's issues, AND to remember compassion and patience as we support-- I guess, to move out of the mindset of a secondary victim and become a "secondary survivor."
Is there a separate journey we need to make from secondary victim to secondary survivor--especially if we've been directly harmed through assault, infidelity, and/or addiction caused by the abuse? Are we responsible for "our" victimization, or for our continued feelings of victimization if we end up supporting a survivor in ways that are unhealthy for us? Since so much of the healing process is obviously in the hands of the survivor, what real control do we have over our secondary healing process?