NAMBLA?! I can't beleive this!!

NAMBLA?! I can't beleive this!!
victor-victim said:
According to the FBI, the organization's sexual advocacy is protected by the First Amendment.

"Everyone has the right to assemble and espouse whatever belief they want," said Dan Dzwilewski, head of the FBI's San Diego office.

Neither of those FBI broad statements are true any longer under the current administration. Additionally, if the entity's speech and actions are criminal and damaging by the opinion of a court, it is not protected assembly or speech.

One thing we never hear about from the media, is the Nambla branches that become infiltrated by vigilantes. I consider them to be hero-phenoms!
 
Have known about NAMBLA for awhile...stumbled across this guy recently ( https://oncefallen.com/ ), and had a lengthy back-and-forth comment debate with him under an article about increased child pornography busting funding (which he was adamantly opposed to). He repeats all the "false memory" statistics, rejects all the statistics for prevalence of sexual abuse (he claims it's like 1 in a thousand or something obscenely low). Turns out the guy is a convicted sex offender because he molested a little girl and is on the sex offender registry (he calls it an "incidental molestation", the creep) and his political goals are to...stop child sex abuse and pornography law enforcement funding (effectively decriminalizing it) and to dismantle the sex offender registry.

Really goes to show what a coward the guy is. Convicted of a crime and put into a registry to warn others about what you've done, and your political goals are to decriminalize what you were convicted of and dismantle the registry you're on? What a selfish creep! And then using denialist tactics of cherry-picked statistics, hand-picked "experts", confusing the issue, and, of course, wrapping the whole thing up in the concept of "personal liberty" (he went on and on about personal liberty...what, the personal liberty to molest and rape children? Fuck off, creep!)

I cannot emphasize too much how insightful it was to get in with this guy in a debate. He backed down because I saw right through him. Just a self-concerned, unempathetic pedophile looking for redemption from society without any sort of atonement. And that's what these political movements are all about.
 
Back
Top