I don't know how to handle this.
********TRIGGERS TRIGGERS TRIGGERS*************
An awful lot of survivors have heard some variation of that theme as a part of their abuse-- "look how aroused you made me," "don't you trust me," or "you don't have to *do* anything". There's no such thing as "passively" bringing someone into your sexual acts.
Look, you can argue passionately that people need love and intimacy, and that denying sexual contact to someone robs them of part of the love we all seek in a relationship, and I will agree with you-- and count myself as lucky that I'm in a position to agree with you.
But the plain fact is that you can't TELL someone that sex = love and intimacy. For many, many survivors, their first and strongest lesson about sex was that sex is a vehicle for power, self-gratification, and shame. The "love and intimacy" part Does. Not. Compute. The only thing that someone who doesn't get it is going to hear, when you say "without sexual intimacy our relationship is doomed," is "all I want from you is sex." It doesn't make them right... but it's real just the same.
I would be very careful about assuming that masturbating next to someone would be a "safe" or "no pressure" activity for them, even if you weren't asking them to do anything. This could be read as manipulation or subversion of safe, non-sexual contact, if you snuggled up to someone in a way that expressed only closeness and comfort, and superimposed your own desires over that in a way that made the survivor feel that to reject your sexual advance was also to reject your love and companionship.Originally posted by Lady Jude:
it is too easy to satisfy a partner in some way which is safe so that there is no justification from where I sit. Love and Intimacy are the most vitally important needs of human beings after food, shelter, and clothing.
*snip*
I think that I would snuggle up to him in bed and begin to "satisfy" myself and he could choose to be the "passive" or "active" "participant" depending on his "needs and desires"...the opportunity for safe Love and Intimacy... just no pressure on him or on me.. no pressure at all...
An awful lot of survivors have heard some variation of that theme as a part of their abuse-- "look how aroused you made me," "don't you trust me," or "you don't have to *do* anything". There's no such thing as "passively" bringing someone into your sexual acts.
Look, you can argue passionately that people need love and intimacy, and that denying sexual contact to someone robs them of part of the love we all seek in a relationship, and I will agree with you-- and count myself as lucky that I'm in a position to agree with you.
But the plain fact is that you can't TELL someone that sex = love and intimacy. For many, many survivors, their first and strongest lesson about sex was that sex is a vehicle for power, self-gratification, and shame. The "love and intimacy" part Does. Not. Compute. The only thing that someone who doesn't get it is going to hear, when you say "without sexual intimacy our relationship is doomed," is "all I want from you is sex." It doesn't make them right... but it's real just the same.