... so for now, i've taken the role of the person in control ... it seems to make sense ... he's felt so out of control for so long ... i told him i would never ever again let him do anything that was going to hurt him ... that i was taking control of that for now until he could ... and there was no question about it ... there would never ever be another incidence of acting out and doing anything like that again ... he seemed to just be so incredibly relieved ...
Selene
normally I would disagree with this, I would always advocate that the survivor has to do the work "their own way, at their own speed"
Phrases such as "I was taking control" are not ones survivors want to read or hear, our abuse was all about "control" and we are now suffering the effects of it as adults.
But then I read it over a few times and I think what you're saying is actually what my wife did.
It's not excercising control over your husband but over the environment that you BOTH find yourself in?
When I disclosed my abuse after 25 years of marriage she was already in control of much of 'our' lives. She did the organizing, looked after the money and basically everything that required some degree of responsibility. I did the practical stuff.
How we had arrived at this I don't know, it just happened, but I was terribly erratic and disorganised and she was the opposite, so I guess it was natural.
But when I disclosed she really did take over and relieve me of everything, and this was to allow me to deal with my 'new problems'.
What she did, and I believe you're doing, is creating an environment that allows us to focus on our issues.
Today I take equal share in what we do, but back then I couldn't have coped.
The whole issue of control and survivors is a long and deep one, it's something we've covered many times before. And talking about it again is always a good thing.
I'm not being critical, but very often the choice of words and phrases can make a big difference in how we as survivors perceive things to, and about, us.
Take care
Dave
