Brothers,
I'm glad this topic has arisen, because I think ALL of us have at some point felt that we are failures - not just failures, but failures AS MEN.
But what could that mean - to be a failure as a man? My guess is that we feel that somehow our claim to be "masculine" has been devalidated by abuse. When we are in that mode it's the shame of abuse talking; we fail to understand, and BELIEVE (which is more important), that abuse is about the victimization of a frightened and confused child who CANNOT defend himself and who is NOT responsible for figuring out escape strategies and so on. When we feel that we are "failures as men", it's in a way the ultimate statement of worthlessness and negative esteem that we carry with us from childhood.
So are we failures "as men"? Of course not. If I can't find a job, am I a "failure as a man"? Not unless manhood is about interview skills. If I cannot perform sexually or am confused sexually, am I a "failure as a man"? Not unless manhood is about sex. And so on.
My take on this is that the "failure as a man" feeling is just that: a FEELING. It's an expression of shame and low self-esteem. It's a signal that all the issues bothering us have reached the point that we are making some pretty grim judgments about ourselves. But if I FEEL that I am a failure as a man, that does not amount to facts on the ground.
Why not? Well, let me look at the rest of my life. What have I done outside of my abuse experiences? Maybe I learned a useful trade or otherwise became capable of supporting myself. Maybe I went to college and developed skills along those lines. If I have problems, I still also have values that are meaningful to me. I may have a wife and children. I may have a relationship that is important to me. I may contribute to the community in various ways. Maybe I am an artist, a musician, a poet, a skilled craftsman, or whatever. The list of things that NEGATE my feeling of failure is probably quite long.
I think what we need to do is see this "failure as a man" feeling as a useful and healthy signal that we are getting things out of perspective. We need a rethink, a talk with a safe confidant, a discussion with the T. The feeling is just a flag telling us, hey, we're getting the picture wrong, time to refocus!
Adam throws out a real challenge: what does it mean, then, to be a "real man". I have an answer, and maybe others will differ and have other ideas. Let's hear them!
A "real man" is a guy who is absolutely honest with himself about who he is, what he needs, and what his dreams are. He then asks how this will allow him to relate to other people fairly, respectfully, and honorably, bearing in mind that others also have needs and dreams that are not less important than his. His feeling of "honor" is in turn based on his effort to set his social, ethical and moral boundaries in a way that is fair to everyone. He stands by these boundaries and standards regardless of the pressures and temptations he encounters, but remains willing to reconsider his position if it seems he is wrong. He admits his frailty and imperfection, while expecting others to do the same. His victory as a man is not measured in triumph over others, but in his ability to live in peace and fulfillment with others who are also fulfilled and at peace.
I know what the objection will be. What will the difference between a "real man" and a "real woman"? My answer: nothing in principle. All of us, men and women, will define our needs, dreams and boundaries in various ways, based on gender differences, our sexuality, ethnic background, social position, and so on. This variety is what makes human existence such a rich and exciting experience.
Adam, your post banged on my cage here! Thanks for getting me thinking on this anew. I would love to know what your reply is.
Much love,
Larry