At that point with Mom
Having been through a lot of roundabout discussion with my mother, I'm at the point where it feels like the true unconscious material might be engaged.
What comes to mind at this moment is a quote from William James:
Common-sense says, we lose our fortune, are sorry and weep; we meet a bear, are frightened and run; we are insulted by a rival, are angry and strike. The hypothesis here to be defended says that this order of sequence is incorrectthat we feel sorry because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble
More simply put, this theory states that when we see a bear, we do not run because we are afraid, but that we are afraid because we run. On the surface, this seems like a chicken and egg question. But looked at more succinctly, I think this is about how we come to know what we feel.
What has been discussed here in other posts is how the evolution of a dynamic with one's mother can result in living as a secret container for her emotions. As a result of this condition, in thinking about this, my mind naturally tries to separate and detach emotions from impulses. Yet as most survivors here know, the impulses that are the source of true difficulty in experiences of abuse are bound up in all kinds of feelings. Getting back to the chicken and egg problem, understanding the difference between impulses and emotions is not always that easy to do.
The conscious anxiety between my mother and I has always been addressed by the first half of the quote. I often think about why I avoid her based on what I'm feeling. But the greater part of the anxiety seems to belong more to the second half of the quote. I know I'm very anxious at times and I know it results in overwhelming emotions. What I don't really get is all of why I'm anxious. A lot of the bad stuff happened in the past. She and I have some good ongoing discussions. They lapse less into confusing mires, based on my sticking to what I have come to understand.
As James argues, feelings may be following from physical sensations instead of resulting in them. For me, there is an ongoing experience of physical sensation that remains stuck behind a traumatic veil. It is tumultuous and rocky ground. What can be hard to do and yet necessary to try to do, is to come into awareness of the trembling, the sensations that slowly emerge if I let them. From there, small pieces of the true emotion come into my conscious experience.
This can involve knowing what my body temperature is, where I am feeling tight in my body, how my breathing is going. All of these are relevant to getting handle on the ongoing dissociation from the interaction and avoidance of the anxiety. All of the above are about finding a way to live in the present. All of the above are about undoing the mirroring of myself in an interaction that makes it hard to know what is actually happening.
I sincerely apologize if this rambling appears only as some sort of philosophical quibble. Perhaps the problem is that it is not clear how much of what I am talking about came into being before I was able to process it mentally and emotionally. Given how I handled my confusion in the past, I can only consider now slowly walking through the tremendous concern about ongoing conditions of helplessness within.
In any case, it would be great to hear from anyone for whom any aspect of this makes some sense.
FB
What comes to mind at this moment is a quote from William James:
Common-sense says, we lose our fortune, are sorry and weep; we meet a bear, are frightened and run; we are insulted by a rival, are angry and strike. The hypothesis here to be defended says that this order of sequence is incorrectthat we feel sorry because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we tremble
More simply put, this theory states that when we see a bear, we do not run because we are afraid, but that we are afraid because we run. On the surface, this seems like a chicken and egg question. But looked at more succinctly, I think this is about how we come to know what we feel.
What has been discussed here in other posts is how the evolution of a dynamic with one's mother can result in living as a secret container for her emotions. As a result of this condition, in thinking about this, my mind naturally tries to separate and detach emotions from impulses. Yet as most survivors here know, the impulses that are the source of true difficulty in experiences of abuse are bound up in all kinds of feelings. Getting back to the chicken and egg problem, understanding the difference between impulses and emotions is not always that easy to do.
The conscious anxiety between my mother and I has always been addressed by the first half of the quote. I often think about why I avoid her based on what I'm feeling. But the greater part of the anxiety seems to belong more to the second half of the quote. I know I'm very anxious at times and I know it results in overwhelming emotions. What I don't really get is all of why I'm anxious. A lot of the bad stuff happened in the past. She and I have some good ongoing discussions. They lapse less into confusing mires, based on my sticking to what I have come to understand.
As James argues, feelings may be following from physical sensations instead of resulting in them. For me, there is an ongoing experience of physical sensation that remains stuck behind a traumatic veil. It is tumultuous and rocky ground. What can be hard to do and yet necessary to try to do, is to come into awareness of the trembling, the sensations that slowly emerge if I let them. From there, small pieces of the true emotion come into my conscious experience.
This can involve knowing what my body temperature is, where I am feeling tight in my body, how my breathing is going. All of these are relevant to getting handle on the ongoing dissociation from the interaction and avoidance of the anxiety. All of the above are about finding a way to live in the present. All of the above are about undoing the mirroring of myself in an interaction that makes it hard to know what is actually happening.
I sincerely apologize if this rambling appears only as some sort of philosophical quibble. Perhaps the problem is that it is not clear how much of what I am talking about came into being before I was able to process it mentally and emotionally. Given how I handled my confusion in the past, I can only consider now slowly walking through the tremendous concern about ongoing conditions of helplessness within.
In any case, it would be great to hear from anyone for whom any aspect of this makes some sense.
FB

