after a bit i thought i might add some more to what i said above.
it seems that most survivors, except those in the advanced stages of recovery, seem to see what happened to them in the context of the present - that is, it's a nightmare w/o end, one that continues on in their lives, even if it happened years, maybe decades in the past. even if they disclose it and act as if it was something in the past, their symptoms may very well belie the fact they are still having difficulty with this trauma.
however, for the partner, the first time they hear this, it *is* something that happenED - as in past tense - to the survivor. furthermore, once completely processed, this revelation can be extremely and profoundly disturbing. it makes no matter whether the two are married or just friends, if someone cares about another person, to hear that person has been hurt in such a dreadful manner as in csa, well, it's deeply troubling for the partner to hear this. if the two are married and have children, yes, initially questions are raised that need to be answered.
now, imagine for a moment a friend tells you he was in an auto accident as child, almost died, maybe spent months in the hospital and to this day still has injuries, or maybe scars, from that accident. maybe it explains why he can't run andor throw a baseball, or some other kind of sports.
so you and your partner are invited to a large group gathering outdoors where maybe a ball game or other activity will take place - would you hesitate to explain why he couldn't join in if someone asked? that is, maybe not details but he's been injured, cannot do x, y, z, etc. and that would be that.
this is not in any way whatsoever meant to trivilize the effect csa has on someone's life so please don't think that's what i'm doing.
what i am saying is it's very clear that part of the problem in healing from csa is the social stigma (whether real or imagined, maybe a bit of both) attached to the trauma.
this stigma is partly related to a generally held viewpoint that people just shouldn't talk about csa which of course, leads to all kinds of misconceptions and the kinds of myths discussed on this website.
now i certainly don't expect everyone to accept my own personal philosophy in life which is "breaking the silence" (originally nothing to do w/csa but certainly is applicable) but i do think it should be at least considered that a survivor's view of what must be kept a secret may very well be detrimental to the survivor's well being. that is, sometimes a partner is obliged to take responsibility and act upon their own knowledge and sense of what is healthy and correct and share information for the good of both involved.
we all do this from time to time - how many times have you chastised a friend to quit smoking? to not drive so fast? or to encourage a younger person to pursue their education? or in the context of sharing information - if one knew a friend or relative's child had been abused - would any of you keep it a secret knowing what you all know? wouldn't you report it immediately to whomever you thought would protect the child?
of course you would - in this context, while the survivor is no longer a child, at one time he was not properly protected (for whatever reason) and as long as this is foremost in his mind, his concern is that by sharing this secret he is once again becoming vulnerable to harm.
on the contrary, this time, someone is trying to protect him from further hurt and harm.
in a healthy relationship partners look out for one another.
i think sometimes we also have to look out for ourselves by sharing our partner's csa in a way that helps us to help him. i think we share so we can better understand our relationship with him and whether or not it's something we want, need, or can even continue - or should continue. we do it for all kinds of reasons, but i don't think any of them are for negative reasons. we aren't doing it to hurt him, and that is the most important point of all. the hurt was done by the abuser. in order to heal, this hurt needs to be identified and treated.
in order for that to happen, communication on many levels which includes the survivor, their partner, and yes, eventually society, is key.
indy